Articles

Articles

Is ‘the Korean Model of Development’ Necessary?
  • Author
    Yeon Seung Chung (Korea Lab. of Developing Countries,)
  • Year
    2016
  • Volume
    Vol.9
  • Number
    No.3
  • Korea has tried to transfer the Korea’s development experiences to developing
    countries. But internationally the Korea’s development experiences are
    understood as a part of ‘the East Asian Model of Development’. There are
    similarities and dissimilarities in the development experiences among Japan,
    Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and China. It seems that Korea claims the
    uniqueness of ‘the Korean Model of Development’ without clearly establishing
    differences with the other East Asian developing economies. This paper offers a
    difference of ‘the Korean Model of Development’. Korea is unique among the
    East Asian developing economies in having several large private business groups
    which can compete with those of advanced countries on equal terms in the
    technology industries like the machine, electronics and chemical industry. In
    addition to the historical heritage of the small-farm society since the second half
    of 17th century, the industrialization during the Japanese occupation and the cold
    war environment after World War II, the Korean government policies of export
    driving, heavy chemical industrialization, R & D inducement and encouraging
    competition among large firms made Korea’s large private firms start new
    industries continuously and become entrepreneurial. The fact that the Korean
    government was able to foster large private entrepreneurial firms in
    manufacturing industry could be a point differentiating ‘the Korean Model of
    Development’ from ‘the East Asian Model of Development’.
  • File